Spinal Haven
← All articles Functional Movement Assessment for Athletes: 7-Step Guide how-to

Functional Movement Assessment for Athletes: 7-Step Guide

Table of Contents

Last Updated: September 14, 2026

What Is a Functional Movement Assessment for Athletes?

A functional movement assessment for athletes is a structured screen that scores how you squat, lunge, hinge, push, pull, and rotate, then flags the patterns that break down under load.

The screen answers one question: can you produce clean movement before you add speed or weight? Most athletes fail that test somewhere. A knee that drifts inward in a bodyweight squat will collapse under a barbell. A shoulder that can't reach overhead without shrugging will compensate on every press.

That's the logic behind the American College of Sports Medicine preparticipation screening guidance and similar frameworks: assess before you load. The screen takes 10 to 15 minutes and produces a number you can track over a season.

The 7 Fundamental Movement Patterns (and What They Reveal)

The seven fundamental movement patterns are the deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability. Each one exposes a different link in the kinematic chain.

  • Deep squat, hip, knee, and ankle mobility plus core control
  • Hurdle step, single-leg stability and pelvic control
  • In-line lunge, deceleration and hip stability under a split stance
  • Shoulder mobility, scapular control and thoracic extension
  • Active straight leg raise, hamstring flexibility and hip dissociation
  • Trunk stability push-up, reflex core stabilization
  • Rotary stability, trunk control through an asymmetric pattern

What most guides miss is that these aren't flexibility tests. They're neuromuscular control tests. An athlete can pass every range-of-motion measure and still fail the hurdle step because the hip doesn't stabilize.

Functional Movement Screen Scoring Criteria, Explained

The functional movement screen scoring criteria run on a 0-to-3 scale for each of the seven patterns, with a maximum composite score of 21 (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The scoring itself is the part people get wrong most often.

  • 3, the pattern is performed without compensation
  • 2, the pattern is completed with a visible compensatory pattern
  • 1, the athlete cannot complete the pattern as instructed
  • 0, pain is present anywhere during the test

A zero stops the screen (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Pain during a movement test isn't a training problem, it's a clinical one, and it belongs in an evaluation rather than a corrective program. The composite score matters less than the asymmetry between sides: a left-right difference in a single pattern is a bigger red flag than a uniformly mediocre score.

SFMA vs FMS for Injury Prevention: Which Fits Your Situation?

SFMA versus FMS comes down to purpose. The Functional Movement Screen is a screening tool for healthy, active people. SFMA is a clinical assessment used when pain is already present.

FMS SFMA
Purpose Screen healthy athletes Assess painful movement
Who runs it Coaches, trainers Licensed clinicians
Output 0-3 score per pattern Breakdown with differential diagnosis
Best for Pre-season baseline Chronic pain, failed rehab

The FMS tells you something is off. SFMA tells you why. That distinction matters for anyone dealing with recurring sciatica or back pain that keeps returning after generic physical therapy.

Watch Out Scoring your own screen is unreliable. Athletes consistently rate their own compensation as normal because it feels familiar. Get an outside set of eyes, or film the screen from the front and side.

How to Do a Functional Movement Assessment: A Step-by-Step Protocol

A standardized protocol is what makes a screen worth repeating. Change the setup, the dowel position, or the warm-up, and your re-screen six weeks later compares two different tests. Here is a gym- or clinic-ready sequence you can run in 10 to 15 minutes with a dowel, a 2x6 board roughly 4 feet long, and a measuring tape.

A physical therapist in athletic clothing kneeling beside an adult athlete performing a deep squat on a clinic floor, both focused on movement quality, bright natural light
A physical therapist in athletic clothing kneeling beside an adult athlete performing a deep squat on a clinic floor, both focused on movement quality, bright natural light

Setup before the first rep. Warm up for 5 minutes of light activity, movement quality changes after light activity, so screen warm, not cold. Have the athlete in shorts and a t-shirt, shoes off, and stand far enough back that you can see the whole body from the front and the side. Score each pattern on the first attempt, not the best of three.

  1. Deep squat. Dowel overhead, feet shoulder-width, toes forward. Heels stay down, dowel stays over the feet, torso stays as upright as the athlete's proportions allow. Watch for heel lift, knee valgus, and the dowel drifting forward.
  2. Hurdle step. Set the band at tibial tuberosity height. The athlete steps over and back without touching the band, keeping the stance leg locked and the pelvis level. Score each leg separately, this is where most asymmetries surface.
  3. In-line lunge. Rear foot on the board, dowel vertical behind the back, front heel down. Note any loss of balance, torso rotation, or the dowel losing contact with the spine.
  4. Shoulder mobility. Fist-to-fist reach behind the back, measuring the distance between the fists. One hand comes over the shoulder, the other up the spine. Compare sides.
  5. Active straight leg raise. Athlete flat, dowel at the knee. The ankle should clear the dowel without the opposite leg lifting or the pelvis rotating.
  6. Trunk stability push-up. From the floor, men from the toes, women from the knees. The body moves as one unit, no sagging hips, no leading chest.
  7. Rotary stability. Quadruped, same-side arm and leg extend. Score the diagonal pattern, then clear the spine with the flexion and extension clearing tests.

Record every score and every asymmetry before you coach anything. The composite is a headline; the asymmetry list is the story.

Sport-specific modifications to the standard screen

A generic screen tells you the athlete moves poorly. It does not tell you whether that matters for their sport. Most practitioners find the seven patterns need small adjustments depending on the demands of the position or event:

  • Swimmers and overhead athletes, weight the shoulder mobility and trunk stability push-up patterns more heavily, and add a thoracic extension check, because the screen's shoulder test does not capture the repeated overhead arc that drives most shoulder issues in this group.
  • Contact and collision athletes, the rotary stability and hurdle step patterns predict the split-second deceleration and trunk bracing that show up on every tackle or cut. A failed rotary stability in a lineman is a different problem than a failed rotary stability in a distance runner.
  • Sprint and jump athletes, the active straight leg raise and in-line lunge carry more weight, because hamstring and hip dissociation drive both top speed and change-of-direction.
  • Endurance athletes, the deep squat and hurdle step often expose the ankle and hip restrictions that build up over high mileage, even when the athlete reports no pain.

Can you screen yourself at home?

A home-based self-assessment can approximate the screen without equipment. Film yourself from the front and side, run the deep squat and the single-leg balance variations, and compare sides. It won't replace a clinical assessment, but it will show you which side is weaker.

Pro Tip Wearable technology now tracks single-leg loading and gait asymmetry during normal training. Pair that data with an annual screen and you get a movement picture across the whole season, not just one day in the preseason.

What a failed score does to an athlete's head

The part almost no protocol article covers is what happens after the screen. A low score or a flagged asymmetry can trigger what clinicians call kinesiophobia, a fear of movement that makes the athlete guard, hesitate, and underperform the very pattern you are trying to fix. A common pattern is the athlete who scores a 1 on the deep squat, hears "your squat is broken," and then avoids squatting entirely for a month.

A few habits keep the screen from becoming a diagnosis in the athlete's mind:

  • Frame the score as a starting point, not a verdict. "This is where we begin" lands differently than "this is what's wrong with you."
  • Pair every low score with the first corrective step in the same conversation, so the athlete leaves with a plan rather than a label.
  • Re-screen on a fixed schedule so the athlete sees the number move. Progress is the antidote to fear.
  • Watch for avoidance behaviors, skipped warm-ups, favoring one side, refusing certain lifts, and address them directly rather than letting them calcify into a training habit.

Expected result: a seven-pattern score, a ranked asymmetry list, a sport-specific weighting for what actually matters in the athlete's event, and a clear next step the athlete can act on the same day.

Corrective Exercises for Movement Dysfunction: Turning Scores Into Action

Corrective exercises for movement dysfunction follow one rule: fix the lowest-scoring pattern first, and don't add load until it scores a 2. The mistake most athletes make is chasing the pattern that feels worst rather than the one that scored worst, those are often different, and the score is the one that predicts injury risk.

Programming the correction

A workable structure is two to three corrective sessions per week, 10 to 15 minutes each, layered on top of the athlete's normal training. Keep the corrective work low-intensity, this is not conditioning. The goal is to re-teach a pattern, not to fatigue it.

  • Failed deep squat, goblet squats to a box, ankle dorsiflexion drills against a wall, and hip flexor work. Start with 2 sets of 8 to 10 reps, box height set so the athlete can hit depth without the heel lifting.
  • Failed hurdle step, single-leg balance with a contralateral reach, split-stance hip stability holds, and step-downs from a low box. 2 to 3 sets of 6 to 8 reps per side.
  • Failed in-line lunge, split-stance isometric holds, rear-foot-elevated split squats with bodyweight only, and hip flexor stretching. 2 sets of 8 per side.
  • Failed shoulder mobility, thoracic extension over a foam roller, wall slides, and side-lying windmills. 2 sets of 10 reps.
  • Failed active straight leg raise, hamstring flossing with a band, supine hip dissociation drills, and dead bugs with a slow eccentric. 2 sets of 8 per side.
  • Failed trunk stability push-up, plank progressions from the knees, dead bugs, and half-kneeling anti-rotation presses. 2 to 3 sets of 8 to 10 reps.
  • Failed rotary stability, bird dog, dead bug, and half-kneeling chops. 2 sets of 6 to 8 reps per side, slow and controlled.

Re-screen timeline and what to do when a score stalls

Re-screen every four to six weeks. If a score isn't moving, the exercise isn't the problem, the diagnosis is. A few common reasons a pattern stays stuck:

  • The athlete is still loading the pattern in training. Corrective work cannot outrun a heavy squat session performed with the same compensation three times a week.
  • The restriction is upstream or downstream of the pattern. A failed hurdle step often traces back to an ankle that won't dorsiflex, not a hip that won't stabilize.
  • The screen was scored inconsistently. Different tester, different dowel position, different warm-up, the number moves for reasons that have nothing to do with the athlete.
  • Pain is present and was never cleared. A zero stops the screen for a reason. That athlete belongs in a clinical evaluation, not a corrective program.

That's where a clinician trained in both SFMA and the McKenzie Method® can provide valuable insights. SFMA breaks down why a painful pattern fails; McKenzie looks at whether the symptom is coming from a disc, a joint, or a nerve. For an athlete with recurring sciatica or back pain that keeps returning after generic physical therapy, this combined approach can help identify the root cause.

Watch Out Do not stack corrective exercises on top of a full training load and expect the pattern to change. If the athlete is squatting heavy three times a week with the same compensation, the corrective work is being overwritten faster than it is being learned.

A screen without a re-screen is just a snapshot. The value comes from tracking the same seven patterns over months, adjusting the plan when a score stalls, and knowing when to hand the athlete to a clinician instead of adding another exercise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the 7 functional movement screening tests?

The Functional Movement Screen uses seven tests: deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability. Each test is scored from 0 to 3 based on whether the athlete can complete the pattern without compensatory movement. The total score helps coaches and clinicians spot asymmetry between sides and decide which patterns need corrective work before training load increases.

What is a good FMS score for athletes?

A perfect FMS score is 21, but most trained athletes land between 14 and 17. A total of 14 or lower, or any score of 1 on a single test, is often used as a flag for closer review rather than a stand-alone injury prediction. The score matters less than the pattern behind it. One athlete scoring 16 with clean symmetry may need less attention than a 17 with a painful 1 on shoulder mobility.

How does the SFMA differ from the FMS?

The SFMA is a clinical assessment used when an athlete already has pain. It starts with the same seven patterns but adds a break-out phase that separates a mobility problem from a stability or motor-control problem. The FMS screens healthy, pain-free athletes for injury risk and readiness. In practice, athletes move between the two: FMS for baseline screening, SFMA when a painful pattern needs a specific cause identified.

Can functional movement assessments help with chronic back pain?

They can help identify the movement patterns feeding the pain. A clinician trained in SFMA, such as the team at Spinal Haven, breaks painful patterns into mobility versus stability faults and builds a plan around the root cause. That approach pairs well with the McKenzie Method for disc-related symptoms and gives athletes specific drills to self-manage between visits.


Chronic back pain and recurring movement limitations rarely resolve with generic exercise plans. At Spinal Haven, Dr. Elizabeth Kingshott Cary, PT, DPT, Cert. MDT, combines SFMA assessment with the McKenzie Method® to find the root cause instead of chasing symptoms, in one-on-one sessions built around your sport and your schedule. Book a discovery call and get a movement plan you can actually maintain.